All of our research centers around the connection ranging from two head predictor details-actual family towards Myspace and you may wedding into the Facebook Matchmaking Fix Behaviors — and you will each other standard and you will Twitter-certain connecting personal financing. To check on the relationship anywhere between these two types of bridging public investment, manage parameters, plus the predictors we identify over, i ran a number of nested OLS regressions.
In the regression predicting Facebook-specific bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 5.4% of the variance, with gender (?=.207, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.098, p<.05) emerging as significant, such that women and those with higher self-esteem reported higher perceived Facebook bridging social capital. The addition of the Facebook usage variables-minutes on Facebook, total Facebook Friends, and actual friends-increased the R 2 to .131, with minutes (?=.144, p<.01) and actual friends (?=.218, p<.001) positively predicting Facebook bridging social capital, supporting H1a. 569, p<.001) increased the model's R 2 to .394 and provided support for H2a. Full results are presented in Table 2.
FRMB assesses the new extent to which subjects statement they engage in points one laws awareness of and you can intentionally cultivate relationship into the site; these types of items are answering Friends’ implicit or specific financial support demands and you can creating “happy birthday celebration” with the an effective Buddy’s Wall
In the regression predicting general bridging social capital, the control variables accounted for 9.3% of the variance; as with Facebook-specific bridging social capital, gender (?=.182, p<.001) and self-esteem (?=.255, p<.001) were significant predictors. The addition of the time and Friends variables increased the R 2 to .168. Total Facebook Friends (?=.118, p<.05) emerged as a significant predictor in this model; however, the impact of actual friends (?=.190, p<.001) on general bridging social capital was stronger, supporting H1b. Adding Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors to the model increased the R 2 to .229, and the significant positive relationship between FRMB and bridging social capital (?=.278, p<.001) provided support for H2b. See Table 3 for the full regression model.
Our research question probed the relationship between the number of “actual” friends and users’ engagement in relationship maintenance activities (FRMB), as they relate to bridging social capital. First, we conducted an OLS regression (see Model 4 in Tables 2 and 3) using the same variables as used in previous analyses as well as an interaction term (actual friends by FRMB). The interaction term was significant in both the general (?=?.571, p<.05) and Facebook-specific (?=?.857, p<.001) bridging models, suggesting that the impact of FRMB on bridging social capital may be moderated by users' reported number of actual friends in their Facebook network. The significant negative term indicates that for Facebook users who report fewer actual friends on Facebook, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with a larger increase in bridging social capital than for users who reported more actual friends on the site.
To further examine this finding, we conducted a simple slopes analysis ( Aiken West, 1991). We observed effects of FRMB on bridging social capital at three levels of actual friends: (1) reported value, (2) reported value minus one standard deviation, and (3) reported Was sind die besten schwarzen Dating-Seiten? value plus one standard deviation. Results indicated that FRMB’s influence on both Facebook-specific and general bridging social capital significantly differed across the three measurement points for actual friends. For all three levels, greater engagement in FRMB was correlated with higher perceived bridging social capital (see Figure 1). However, those with the fewest actual friends saw the greatest gains in bridging social capital as their engagement in FRMB increased. An analysis of variance shows this difference across the three levels of actual friends is significant for Facebook-specific bridging social capital, F(82)= p<.001, and trends towards significance with general bridging social capital, F(86)=3.204 p=.077.
Dialogue
In this data, we talk about the connection anywhere between bridging social financial support and two areas off Twitter have fun with because of questionnaire study compiled out of a sample out of You.S. grownups. We employed one or two independent strategies out of connecting personal funding-one to examining the huge benefits for the interactions that have one’s circle of Facebook Family and the most other centering on one’s interactions along with his otherwise their whole social network. Verifying and you may growing to your earlier knowledge off Facebook use ( e.g., Burke ainsi que al., 2011; Ellison ainsi que al., 2011), we find significant self-confident dating between such procedures out of connecting personal investment and you may the quantity of “actual” Fb household members players claim that he’s got in addition to their involvement for the Facebook Matchmaking Repairs Behaviors. This research results in our very own comprehension of brand new interpersonal fictional character from SNS explore of the (1) determining just how users’ engagement on the personal brushing routines identified over relate genuinely to attitudes regarding bridging societal resource-both within their Facebook Buddy community in addition to their social networking a lot more broadly-and you can explicating the latest social, structural, and you can interest-filtering character and this subscribe which dating; (2) examining the differences between observed full and “actual” Members of the family on the site when it comes to bridging societal financial support effects; and you may (3) exploring differences in perceptions from standard bridging societal money anywhere between profiles and you may nonusers of website.
