The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals) online incontri indiani, F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.
The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.
Practitioners having good constructivist epistemology tended to place so much more increased exposure of the personal thread in the therapeutic dating versus practitioners having a beneficial rationalist epistemology
The present day study revealed that counselor epistemology are a serious predictor with a minimum of particular areas of the functional alliance. The best selecting was a student in relation to the development of a beneficial individual thread involving the visitors and you can specialist (Thread subscale). It supports the notion about books one to constructivist therapists put an elevated emphasis on strengthening a quality healing relationship described as, “greet, wisdom, believe, and you can caring.
Theory step three-your choice of Particular Therapeutic Treatments
The next and last investigation is designed to target the new forecast you to definitely epistemology is an excellent predictor from specialist accessibility certain treatment process. Way more especially, that the rationalist epistemology tend to declaration using techniques with the cognitive behavioural therapy (e.grams. advice offering) over constructivist epistemologies, and practitioners with constructivist epistemologies usually statement playing with processes for the constructivist cures (e.g. psychological running) more than therapists which have rationalist epistemologies). A multiple linear regression study try conducted to choose in case the predictor variable (counselor epistemology) usually determine therapist recommendations of your own expectations variables (medication techniques).
Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.
Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.
