*Toward multivariate data comparing gents and ladies, i reweighted the newest men’s decide to try and make their dimensions even more equivalent to this of one’s ladies’ decide to try, thereby deciding to make the ratio of men in order to girls even more exactly like the ratio regarding the Honduran standard society. That it changes involved multiplying all of the men’s room weights because of the 2.cuatro. The outcome try an adjusted total weighted sample sized 11,973 males, in contrast to eleven,990 respondents regarding adjusted take to of females.
†In this article, «husband you wills» and you may «wives» tend to be someone who are in consensual unions as well since the people who find themselves hitched.
‡Socioeconomic standing try classified just like the lowest, medium or large predicated on a services and products-and-attributes index predicated on 9 potential domestic has or pregnant local dating possessions: piped drinking water, toilet, stamina, broadcast, television, ice box, mobile, private automobile, and electric or gasoline kitchen stove.
References
step one. Population Council and you can Interagency Gender Performing Class (IGWG), Energy in the intimate relationships: a hole discussion among reproductive health professionals, Ny: Population Council, 2001.
2. Speizer Try, Try husbands a barrier so you can women’s household members planning use? the scenario out of Morocco, Public Biology, 1999, 46(1–2):1–16; Bankole Good and you can Singh S, Couples’ virility and birth prevention choice-while making in the developing places: hearing the fresh man’s voice, Internationally Nearest and dearest Considered Views, 1998, 24(1):15–24; and you can Becker S, Computing unmet you need: spouses, husbands or lovers? Global Nearest and dearest Thought Views, 1999, 25(4):172–180.
Blanc An excellent, The results of power inside the sexual relationship towards the sexual and you will reproductive health: an examination of the data, Knowledge inside the Relatives Thought, 2001, 32(3):189–213
step 3. Watkins S, Rutenberg N and Wilkinson D, Planned theories, crazy ladies, in: Jones GW mais aussi al., New Carried on Demographic Changeover,
Nyc: Oxford University Press, 1997; and you will Bawah AA ainsi que al., Ladies’ concerns and you can men’s room anxiousness: the brand new perception out of nearest and dearest planning on intercourse interactions inside the northern Ghana, Education inside Family Think, 1999, 30(1):54–66.
eight. Kishor S, Independence and you will Egyptian Ladies: Results in the 1988 Egypt Demographic and you will Fitness Questionnaire, DHS Periodic Documents, Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, 1995, Zero. 2; Kishor S, Ladies’ birth-control use in Egypt: precisely what do lead steps regarding empowerment let us know? Papers demonstrated during the annual conference of Populace Association out of The united states, Los angeles, California, Us, ; Kritz M, Makinwa-Adebusoye P and you will Gurak D, This new role out-of intercourse perspective inside the creating reproductive choices into the Nigeria, in: Presser HB and you will Sen G, eds., Ladies’ Empowerment and you will Market Techniques: Swinging Beyond Cairo, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Drive, 2000; and you can Mason K and Smith H, Husbands’ in the place of wives’ fertility goals and employ out-of contraceptive: the new dictate of sex context inside five Parts of asia, Demography, 2000, 37(3):299–311.
ten. Globe Lender, Challenges and possibilities to have intercourse guarantee inside the Latin The usa and also the Caribbean, 2003, , reached ics for the Latin The united states, Inhabitants Bulletin, 2003, 58(1):3–thirty six.
11. Ministry away from Wellness, Honduras, and Honduras Household members Thought Organization, Honduras: Encuesta Nacional de Epidemiologia y Salud Common-2001, y Encuesta Nacional de Salud Masculina, Informe Last, Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers to possess Condition Manage and Protection (CDC), 2002.
15. Parrado Age and you may Tienda Meters, Women’s opportunities and you may family members creation in Venezuela: the new different consensual relationship? Societal Biology, 1997, 44(1): 1–24; and Desai S, Youngsters at risk: the fresh role out-of family members design in the Latin America and West Africa, Inhabitants and Development Remark, 1992, 18(4):689–717.
16. Blanc A beneficial, 2001, op. cit. (discover source cuatro); and you will Argawal B, «Bargaining» and sex connections: within and not in the household, Feminist Economics, 1997, 3(1):1–51.
17. Ministry of Health, Honduras, and you may Honduras Family Considered Organization, 2002, op. cit. (see source eleven); and you can Ministry off Wellness, Honduras, and Honduras Household members Thought Relationship, Honduras: Encuesta Nacional de- Salud Masculina-1996, Informe Finally, Atlanta, GA, USA: CDC, 1998.
